"UBER ALLES IN DER WELT" ... is a part of the German anthem, which means "all over the world ..." ; W. Leibniz, German philosopher (Xuxa) - teaches that ... "if it is really There are many worlds, this is probably the best of all, (although it is 0.07 degrees per year hot-lol-) ... Well! with the proviso that the Germans did not refer, in his hymn to this world, but the opposition which is deduced from antiquiasmica philosophy of Leibniz (racionalistomierdoso) or the Probalan "worst of all," I'm going to despotrikar a bit about criminal law, only a little, is that I created this heart, especially of the tricuspid valve. (my vision of criminal law itself! and only relative.)
start with what history has then disappeared: A gay criminal law, if so is criminal law gay, that's what we're taught in college ... well to hell with the story, the better we go from front to the stage of functionalism normativist Gunther Jakobs .... AND NOT WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE DIVISION OF ILLICIT -iniuria- and the sources of obligations, or the division of Gayo (sources) ... that already! ... as to the type of Binding (something perfect, do not argue), among others perhaps talk about Welzel, but there I can say: the "logical structure" ... sorry Hans, I'm still looking for them, not finding I am sure that neither von Kries with its coefficient of regularity and constancy of the cases pending 'theory the cause adeacudad " (pun intended) could have found them, is that so many things and situations that happen in everyday natural life (ontological) that can be articulated in a world of rules, laws or principles (deontological ), which requires at least one trialismo , say at least to remind Sessarego and jump to Brazil Reale (the initiator), and pass it up ... and now tampoko that is enough, but it is an effort and maybe the greatest. (in the problem under study)
The Rechtssoziologi Luhmann: Network function or role, duty, communication, autopoiesis, Native Communities, city, person, norm, guarantees and expectations ..... -Beyond-a wanker who gets to teach as a frog suit (anfibologiko M.) .... and, well: so far not found grace, working with finalism Welzeniano in a "seminar-workshop "(and not even know what that shit is ... not the point.) Therefore, taking into account that the teacher tells us to read the final system concepts, then garbage in class, with extreme functional postural G. Jakobsen, leagues that-a-note is to be welcomed . (told us that he was a finalist in their times, Xuxa that happened, then? ... Jakobs stole the idea of \u200b\u200bfucking manual Welzel, or would like more now criminal law "so" ... or indeed that the existence overcame its essence, no! ... Anyway was Welzel Jakobs teacher and it was he who convinced him to move from Kiel to Bon to continue studying law, I do not know if Jakobs Trujillo came in the 60's pulled people to Bon and did something.
The Rechtssoziologi Luhmann: Network function or role, duty, communication, autopoiesis, Native Communities, city, person, norm, guarantees and expectations ..... -Beyond-a wanker who gets to teach as a frog suit (anfibologiko M.) .... and, well: so far not found grace, working with finalism Welzeniano in a "seminar-workshop "(and not even know what that shit is ... not the point.) Therefore, taking into account that the teacher tells us to read the final system concepts, then garbage in class, with extreme functional postural G. Jakobsen, leagues that-a-note is to be welcomed . (told us that he was a finalist in their times, Xuxa that happened, then? ... Jakobs stole the idea of \u200b\u200bfucking manual Welzel, or would like more now criminal law "so" ... or indeed that the existence overcame its essence, no! ... Anyway was Welzel Jakobs teacher and it was he who convinced him to move from Kiel to Bon to continue studying law, I do not know if Jakobs Trujillo came in the 60's pulled people to Bon and did something.
a book in the introduction, M. Sancinetti (read in class), he quotes Santigo Carlos Nino, which says that the set of axioms of a criminal school, can live, too, with another school axiomatic postulates criminal, as The results can aser them at the time of resolution of cases to apply (something) , but then, what we have, that we put aside, and if we did not find position?, then accept what Santiago Nino more than anything, is a statement for schools and general positions, or fall into the immoral practice of creating a mutant Frankeinstein or a system to resolve cases scientifically ... I can not say more, I have to study the two ... the teacher says and believe that the end normativist functionalism are compatible, but I do know is that compatibility is not stored in your outcome to be friction, or is larger for the other loosely can be introduced, or otherwise is incompatible, and this is a priori, without further ...
separate topic, becomes immoral, by a professor, teaching the shadows of the cave, Plato being (oversized label, knowing it is a "Theaetetus" making a dent in any position without a trial rulers, most of the seminar are civilians [quotation marks as civilians] ) , judicial practice, not a mere reflection of what is studied and is well aware that even "the worst and-also- the best of the unfortunate "that they held the race, but if we stop to defend a position or at least to criticize after another, fall into the indifference to apply either, though the cost of doing science is not , and worse, so as always apply criminal law arising in other countries and apply it to the perfection of the theory, and this not sound like a metanarrative of those of F. Fukuyama, since by some hidden hand could go who revealed that the "right" is a science of absolute application at any latitude, which I doubt, though the other side of the coin tbm me the same thing could happen, (no return quisera the time when rationalism confronts historicism) since Germany is the world -and true to its anthemic crap- , not everyone below her, but she is part of the world, and that apprehension is relative and then absolute in certain contexts, which influence it to perfect it for a while, until it reaches a critical point where fuck all, and it is that we only have the "meanwhile" a final conviction or functionalist (in order) ... but just one.
Now " mutations" that "meanwhile," depend on the situation of immorality, of how to study, apply, and taught criminal law and law in general, which, we should extinguish.
0 comments:
Post a Comment