Reinhard Zimmermann and collateral idea few days ago I read one item of R. Zimmermann Rights "which deals with Roman in the European tradition entitled" Roman Law and European Culture "... and suddenly I realized that the civil law without the work of Irnerio, the commentators, postglosadores, pandects and etc. .. . in ancient texts sucks. Ya! can not create, I do not remember exactly from when civilians can not create more figures ... but only to seek and dig in the digest and deal with this q interpretations to "rediscover" something new, or wait for such a revolution China, Cuba , American and French to recognize the nature without any a priori theory to build on something.
A point where I would like to shave -by way of example, only- is on institutions following one is the "Rebus sic stantibus" -o implicit-termination clause and the other is: " proprium venire contra factum non valet " -this, also known as the Stoppel in the" virtuous "public international law- whose origins are discussed if they belong to the English tradition of the ius commune or , what really is not controversial, are the bases on civil law of the two figures, new bone texts of classical culture, which affect the investigator, unable to turn in a change of axis. Páez
are meant only to read the "corpus juris civilis" and try to rescue some figure or abstract concepts such pamphlets. It seems odd that figures such as inheritance or the same family law continue to be covered with Roman concept, as the issue of capacity or of portions of the legitimate and freely available, something must be done, especially in South America or Latin America already had enough with the Indian Act, The Law of bull, and any rogue crocodile who wanted to impose its laws, we should try to move to the right under advancing our society, I say evolve to right, q q until now we have been given is pure Romanist transformed, at least in economic matters. At least find out something good to refresh or otherwise condemn and we should create legal figures in the light of our social condition, in order to find a valid proper to each one of them.
Roxin learn from the criminal, who is inspired by the futility of some figures of criminal law as the complicity and participation forms of delict, which were not fully functional at the time to punish the Nazi leaders because C. Roxin gave rise to a theory called "command responsibility , ojala q over time, they see no Roxin criminologists, is just one example, as to Paul, or Pompin Gayo, where q will have invariably ever occur, except that I do not mean it did not take hold in their theories, but to see inspirancion sole and unique source point ....
