Again Olaechea caste, their study legal, and French books binomial " PLANIOL - RIPERT ." This time I bring a snack an article which was written by columnist brand today of Peru 21: Fernando Berckemeyer Olaechea ; say everything is due to Fritz Du Bois The fact that Berckmeyer is writing in the newspaper ... if more can not remember " Du Bois " was the name of the lady with whom Manuel Agusto Olaecha married .... (There is the family always comes out ... but the time is " dinosauriezco) jajaja .
The civil liability, that nit?: if any one SUBJECTIVE FACTOR ALLOCATION (willfully or negligently) to act ...
and when there blames the act?: when a fortuitous event a force majeure, triggering event a third party "," negligence of the victim "... t Ipicas residual response - VRG . There is a black surface with a white dot in the center, then everything that is not white is black, well actually poko matter is almost an axiom, no need to know the moral composition of black or white concept, the same analysis for all legal figure as if it were a syllogism which is due out equivalents.
Berckemayer Olaechea in article "THE DANGEROUS MYTH OF LIABILITY IN THE FOUNDATIONS OF TORT LIABILITY " (click), in short, criticism from civil liability objective in the argument that more evolved a society that is always a degree of guilt by the person who commits any fact which damage develops ...
(blah blah blah blah) ... the damage to both imperial Rome and in the XXI century society may have come from the guilt of the person, and ignores the factor "risk", which gives the note of objectivity to responsibility, to simply say that, anyway, albeit tiny , always there fault where we believe there exists a "risk." At the height of the evils, I mean the cherry of his article, at the end opposed "jurisprudence of concepts" with " rationalist philosophy" to say that what is sought is "justified" (after all) ...
Fernando Berckemeyer , we proposed to his article (2001): the existence of guilt as to place, based on the logic of nowhere, without further argument that technology and modernity not change the essence of human beings sometimes inefficient and efficient pokas other .... then the answer can not be iusnaturalista, by but also I could justify the stay don "objective liability system " referring to the dialectic class, and why I am not a neo-Marxist .
[...] I wonder that some days, base the requirement purchasing the personalism of Mounier ....... either way ....
Well shit do not know why "some" of the teachers, who were once students at the university where they lecture today (PUCP), are given for writing such nonsense, and top publishing; please do not raise the "state of matter " if it is not going to solve the problem ... the state of the question or rather by "the question that everyone asks" nobody has to become famous ... and pretend makeup to make it less baroque.
These are the implications of commercialism with which "THEMIS " emerge.
* in the part that speaks of the AED, as a "catalyst" for the target system, better not touch it, natural law is extreme ... aj "cheapest cost avoider."
0 comments:
Post a Comment